Thread title says it. I've used this strain 5 times now, and 4 of them have over attenuated. The first was about 90% from an all malt bill. This batch had an emergency overnight mash as life got in the way of brewing. Highly fermentable mash? Sure, let's call it an anomaly.
Similar results on the next two, but not as drastic. 80 and 82%. Just a bit higher than the website listing at 77% on the top end. Not too far off, I could live with this. I just ended up checking my latest creation after the D-rest / complete attenuation ramp and measured it at 1.008. OG for it was 1.058. 86% attenuation. Somewhat unusual and unexpected.
On this last one, it was a 90 minute mash at 65 C (149F). Nothing too outrageous.
Grist:
65% Pale Ale (weyermann)
12% each Crystal 60, Pale Wheat (head retention), Munich 10L
My note taking does need improvement. Some batches had a starter, some had direct slurry from the fermenter. In either case a yeast calculator was used to ensure there was no massive over or under pitching. Hydrometer readings only, always very near calibration and adjusted accordingly. There was an incident involving my previous hydrometer (RIP) and this newest batch is using the new one. I think we can rule out a bad calibration. Particularly since with every other yeast the readings are exactly as expected.
Fermentation schedule varied between batches. Either 8C or 10C (46 or 50F) for 2-3 weeks, then a ramp to 16 (60F) or ambient room temperature for said D-rest. Not that I'm sure it was really needed, I think the only thing accomplished was ridding the beer of a wonderful hop aroma. After a week there, a cold crash, fining and packaging.
Any experiences similar to mine? Any clue as to what it is that I'm doing out of the ordinary? I know the idea of "Oh well, more ABV" lives on, but loosing 8 points below your expected FG is becoming a bit of a bother. This wasn't supposed to be a 6.5%, it was supposed to be 5! Oddly enough, none of the beer with the over attenuation has been dry. It's always maintained a decent malt backbone.
Similar results on the next two, but not as drastic. 80 and 82%. Just a bit higher than the website listing at 77% on the top end. Not too far off, I could live with this. I just ended up checking my latest creation after the D-rest / complete attenuation ramp and measured it at 1.008. OG for it was 1.058. 86% attenuation. Somewhat unusual and unexpected.
On this last one, it was a 90 minute mash at 65 C (149F). Nothing too outrageous.
Grist:
65% Pale Ale (weyermann)
12% each Crystal 60, Pale Wheat (head retention), Munich 10L
My note taking does need improvement. Some batches had a starter, some had direct slurry from the fermenter. In either case a yeast calculator was used to ensure there was no massive over or under pitching. Hydrometer readings only, always very near calibration and adjusted accordingly. There was an incident involving my previous hydrometer (RIP) and this newest batch is using the new one. I think we can rule out a bad calibration. Particularly since with every other yeast the readings are exactly as expected.
Fermentation schedule varied between batches. Either 8C or 10C (46 or 50F) for 2-3 weeks, then a ramp to 16 (60F) or ambient room temperature for said D-rest. Not that I'm sure it was really needed, I think the only thing accomplished was ridding the beer of a wonderful hop aroma. After a week there, a cold crash, fining and packaging.
Any experiences similar to mine? Any clue as to what it is that I'm doing out of the ordinary? I know the idea of "Oh well, more ABV" lives on, but loosing 8 points below your expected FG is becoming a bit of a bother. This wasn't supposed to be a 6.5%, it was supposed to be 5! Oddly enough, none of the beer with the over attenuation has been dry. It's always maintained a decent malt backbone.