My last two attempts at a Belgian Abbey ale ended up not tasting one bit like a real Abbey Ale (a brune ~10.5% that sat for 5 months, and a blonde ~9.8% that carbonated in two weeks!). The blonde was drinkable, but it did NOT taste like a Belgian ale! It was not bitter enough, and the mouthfeel was wrong, and the Belgian "spice" level was not up to par. Same goes for the brune.
Of note, I used dry T-58 in both brews. If this is a bad strain of our brewing yeast, please tell me now, because otherwise I think I should have ended up with textbook Belgian Abbey ales, based on how scrupulous I am when it comes to following brewing instructions, boiling schedules, sanitizing, etc.
Anyway, both beers ended up being quite sweet...and not especially aromatic, other than the scent of banana-ish esters. Fermentation occurred over 4 months at 69º F (that temperature is surely a constant in this equation). The "spice" level in both was very low, contrary to what you should get when you smell or taste a real Belgian Abbey ale! Should I have attempted fermentation at higher temperatures?
My biggest problem with this whole thing is that I'm EXTREMELY good at making super-strong American ales (Stouts, IPAs, Barleywines [all > 12% ABV]), but my craving for that specific "Belgian Abbey" beer flavor is all but lost with the exception of finding a rare 6 or 4-pack of Chimay/Leffe/other rarities in the most rare of upscale grocery stores.
I think that I *SHOULD* be quite capable of brewing something similar to these Monks myself! I've tried, but all I can think of is that I should have used better yeasts (ie. Salvaged directly from Chimay or Leffe bottles) and attempted to brew the beer with that yeast instead.
I mean, it *HAS* to be the yeast, right? The only other ingredients are sugars and malts and other fermentables! Right?
All else failing, what else could these awesome Monks be doing to make their beers so much tastier than I can with my own personal means? Aging?
I'm about to give up on the whole Belgian thing!
Of note, I used dry T-58 in both brews. If this is a bad strain of our brewing yeast, please tell me now, because otherwise I think I should have ended up with textbook Belgian Abbey ales, based on how scrupulous I am when it comes to following brewing instructions, boiling schedules, sanitizing, etc.
Anyway, both beers ended up being quite sweet...and not especially aromatic, other than the scent of banana-ish esters. Fermentation occurred over 4 months at 69º F (that temperature is surely a constant in this equation). The "spice" level in both was very low, contrary to what you should get when you smell or taste a real Belgian Abbey ale! Should I have attempted fermentation at higher temperatures?
My biggest problem with this whole thing is that I'm EXTREMELY good at making super-strong American ales (Stouts, IPAs, Barleywines [all > 12% ABV]), but my craving for that specific "Belgian Abbey" beer flavor is all but lost with the exception of finding a rare 6 or 4-pack of Chimay/Leffe/other rarities in the most rare of upscale grocery stores.
I think that I *SHOULD* be quite capable of brewing something similar to these Monks myself! I've tried, but all I can think of is that I should have used better yeasts (ie. Salvaged directly from Chimay or Leffe bottles) and attempted to brew the beer with that yeast instead.
I mean, it *HAS* to be the yeast, right? The only other ingredients are sugars and malts and other fermentables! Right?
All else failing, what else could these awesome Monks be doing to make their beers so much tastier than I can with my own personal means? Aging?
I'm about to give up on the whole Belgian thing!