Brewed up over 60 batches now since I started brewing in January of 2014. I think I have put every batch, except maybe two wheat beers, in secondary. I usually harvest yeast, dry hop or just have always used a secondary (maybe I needed my primary before I bought others) or just it was my way of doing things. I've always been pretty happy with my beer and can't recall ever having an oxidation or infection due to using a secondary. Have an amber ale in the Bubbler now. Might just bottle after 3 weeks in the primary to see if I notice a difference, but I'm guessing the only real way to tell a difference would be to brew the same beer and go primary 10 days and secondary for 1-2 weeks and compare those, yes? In general, do you feel non-secondaried beers are better?