JulietKilo
Well-Known Member
Recently made two Weizens, a 3068 and a 3638, both were decent but I felt were light on the ester/banana factor. Room was 70degF, 72-73 in the buckets. Higher?? Other factor(s)?
Two factors: Acid rest at 110F for 15 minutes (assuming you brew all grain) and then ferment cool, 60-64F.
Sorry I should have mentioned that I'm extract, so acid rest is unknown to me.
So warmer for esters, that's easy enough.
And wort density, assuming that's OG? Easy enough to increase that. How high for a weizen?
Pitch rate, using 3068 smack pack, I could not smack it to reduce cell count? Or just make a larger wort volume, I've got a 7.8gal fermenter bucket. Could fit 7 in there w/a blow-off. I've had some Belgian yeast need a blow-off but never a weizen yeast.
Applescrap, I'm using 100% RO water.
For the record, started a Weizen on 10/14 with Lallemand Munich Classic dry yeast, 1.060 OG, and keeping at 75degF, certainly smells more estery at the trap. Just smacked a 3068 and plan the same OG and temp for it. Shall see...
For hefes I only reharvest once, as I can't get the third gen to sit.
Two factors: Acid rest at 110F for 15 minutes (assuming you brew all grain) and then ferment cool, 60-64F.
1.060 is pretty high for a Hefeweizen, it's in fact to high comparing the "style profile. Higher OG will yield more esters. I can notice it very clear it from 1.052 to 1.048. where 1.052 gives you more esters.
By sit you mean lower attenuation?
With 50-70% wheat, it seems the more munich/vienna/cara/etc I have as opposed to pale malt, the less banana/clove I get, even with a long ferulic acid rest. Maybe balanced, but definitely lower, with 3068.
No they attenuate fully, but flavorwise I can't get them to where I want. Probably my harvesting technique/timing.
Hefe's to me are a very simple and easy starter beer because it's easy to brew a passable one. They tolerate and benefit from poor beginner mistakes like lack of aeration and low pitch rates. Plus easy grain bill and hop schedule especially for an extract brewer.
However brewing a great one is the challenge.
Did you pitch an entire packet of Munich Classic in about 5 gallons? I need to experiment more to know for sure but I have a feeling that that would be a severe overpitch for a hefe. I'd be using about 1/4 packet in 5 if I wanted a lot of banana.
The whole packet in 6gal, I'll have to try less in a future batch. I wasn't sure how far one can underpitch having never tried it, I'm assuming attenuation is not at risk when underpitching? Just slower?
I have worked very hard to brew the perfect hefe (for my tastes). Totally disagree about it being a beginner style, if you are someone who knows what a good hefe should taste like.
I did an interesting pitch rate experiment a while back. If your yeast is super healthy (make a fresh starter, crash and decant) then you can get a solid fermentation with as little as 1ml yeast per liter or 1tsp per gallon. This is far less than the pitch rate calculators suggest. For banana you want to abuse the yeast. Use old slurry, no starter, no aeration, and much less that you would normally use. Combine this with a warm ferment to maximise further.
The best hefeweizens I have ever made or tasted from friends were the beginner extract batches where they pitched a vial of old yeast, no starter, and just let 'er rip at room temp. It *is* a style that beginners have no trouble with, but "experts" like many of us struggle to death with because we want to be so kind to the yeast. I believe we *need* to be *unkind* to get the best out of this kind of yeast.
I disagree. Heavily underpitching can give you more banana, but also more of stuff you maybe don't want, because of an unhealty fermentation. I have a very simple take on this. Pitch correctly, for a hefeweizen. Have a healty fermentation and get a "clean" beer, clean as in the esters and phenols you're after are there, but no off flavors.
Half of the magic in creating a great Hefeweizen is in the mash. Prime the mash to what you want it to taste, given a pitch-rate of x-generation yeast, pitch a healty amount of yeast, and get what you want. But this is very difficult. That's where the art of a Hefeweizen is.
I think we are basically in agreement here. I advocate for an underpitch, but not so much that you get yourself into stalled fermentation territory. Part of the art / science is figuring how much to underpitch by, and my point is that you can get away with a lot less than you might think. For me my hefes went from poor to amazing by switching to a warmer sacc-rest (in conjunction with a step mash that I was already doing), and using Weyermann malts. I target around 1.015 FG and these to me taste like the real thing, far better than the dry ones.
Just for anyone interested, here is what it looks like at 24 hours with 2ml of super healthy yeast pitched into approx 1.5L of non-aerated wort...
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/showpost.php?p=7723530&postcount=10
Side by side with 4ml and 7ml (7ml being what I calculated to be the 'normal' pitch rate).
I have worked very hard to brew the perfect hefe (for my tastes). Totally disagree about it being a beginner style, if you are someone who knows what a good hefe should taste like.
I did an interesting pitch rate experiment a while back. If your yeast is super healthy (make a fresh starter, crash and decant) then you can get a solid fermentation with as little as 1ml yeast per liter or 1tsp per gallon. This is far less than the pitch rate calculators suggest. For banana you want to abuse the yeast. Use old slurry, no starter, no aeration, and much less that you would normally use. Combine this with a warm ferment to maximise further.
It all depends on references. Many people call a hefe-grist and a fermentation which has some banana, for a Hefeweizen. I haven't tasted your friends's hefeweizen so I'm not saying that you're wrong. But can they replicate it? And how would they compare to Bavarian Hefeweizens?
But can they replicate it?
Enter your email address to join: