I have always been confused by the notion of "lagering", compared to aging. A lot of it stems from people who say a lager is lagered because that's the only way to make one, usually with no proof that it does something special. Personally, I am inclined to believe that there is nothing special going on and it's the same as aging. As such, the only benefit I can see for "lagering" vs aging at cellar temps is that lagers would keep their flavor profiles longer.
Here is my rationale:
When you drop the temperature, fast or slow, you are making a harsh environment for the yeast. Their metabolism will slow and sooner or later they will go dormant. If the yeast are dormant then they can't really do much of anything. Which means that the changes that we perceive from lagering are just from random chemical reactions and perhaps some amount of settling, just like aging.
Thoughts?
Here is my rationale:
When you drop the temperature, fast or slow, you are making a harsh environment for the yeast. Their metabolism will slow and sooner or later they will go dormant. If the yeast are dormant then they can't really do much of anything. Which means that the changes that we perceive from lagering are just from random chemical reactions and perhaps some amount of settling, just like aging.
Thoughts?