couchsending
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 3,037
- Reaction score
- 2,134
Maybe they use dry yeast as their dry hopping regimen doesn't allow them to re-pitch yeast. Dry is a much more cost effective solution if this is the case...
What is the purity of a brick of S-04. To make it simplistic let's say they use 1000 gram bricks. If it's 95% pure and the rest is others, will 50 grams of other yeast be enough to change the character of a beer? Maybe that's why temp control is key?
I know this will add tons of variables with which we think Nate does not appreciate, but it could explain why some beers have all three strains and the others only have two??
I could be way off... Just trying to think this through
With the possibility of a brick of s-04 not being 100% pure, what would the other yeast in there be? Could it be anything? Could it be wb-06 and t-58? Maybe they're just using s04 and the tests made by isomerization are picking up those "other" yeasts. It could be that TH doesn't even blend! Who knows... at the end of the day we just have to keep experimenting.
I can't imagine the contamination would be anywhere near that high (I'd guess < 0.1% or 1 gm in a 1000 gm brick). That would be terrible practice. Anyone know if yeast labs are subject to FDA regulations? If so, then you can almost guarantee the contamination is coming from somewhere else.
The only thing that can be said with (near) absolute certainty, is that different yeast strains end up in the TH cans. The why/how/when, can't be answered though (the what is speculative but substantial imo).
I can't imagine the contamination would be anywhere near that high (I'd guess < 0.1% or 1 gm in a 1000 gm brick). That would be terrible practice. Anyone know if yeast labs are subject to FDA regulations? If so, then you can almost guarantee the contamination is coming from somewhere else.
The only thing that can be said with (near) absolute certainty, is that different yeast strains end up in the TH cans. The why/how/when, can't be answered though (the what is speculative but substantial imo).
I can't imagine the contamination would be anywhere near that high
fermentis has their microbial data right there on the cut sheet/info page for each strain under "Typical Analysis"
It is seems it is much different - the yeast blends are all coming off too spicy/phenolic or tart - neither of which are things I detect in treehouse beers. The only non-Enlgish character I get is bubblegum, but surprisingly, that has been detected in our house IPAs from time to time during bi-monthly employee sensory.
The data I have is mainly from our own plates - we have been using S-04 for our hoppy beers for over a year now (we originally used wlp007 but found S-04 better for our hoppy beers... and cheaper). Generally we plate our FVs on day 5 of fermentation - at about generation 3 we start to see other yeast morphologies start to pop up - we have not bothered to get these other yeasts sequenced...yet.
Also, a good friend who works at a renowned QA lab in town for the alcohol industry (think of any major brewery/distillery and they have very likely used his company to do QA/QC work) has confirmed fresh bricks of S-05 to be unpure - I can only assume S-04 would be the same.
I don't know Nate or much about him, but I would be surprised if he did not harvest and repitch any of his yeast. I don't know of any other major brewery that doesn't practice this, but maybe that's whats so special about TH!
Like I said, I'm not convinced it's an actual blend - But who knows! I'm wrong about a lot of things but always trying to learn and that's why I still come to these forums and participate in awesome threads like this.
Another thing to think about and an observation I have made. Do you think natural carbing in the keg at room temperature dulls the hoppiness of the beer at all? Ive noticed an IPA I naturally carbed isn't as hoppy as others that I have forced carbed in a few days. COuld this be due to keeping it at warm a warm temp for a week? I will be kegging tomorrow and will give the natural carb another go as the bubbles much finer and stick around longer.
Would have been helpful to just post it, but was an easy find...
fwiw, I have yet to get any fruit, juice or Tree House character from T-58. Maybe someone can chime in on what temp got them there. I'm pretty dubious tbh. My most serious attempt was S-04 and T-58 with Comet single hop. I thought it was too thin and didn't notice T-58 giving me anything that I particularly wanted. The caveat is that Comet is a crazy hop, and it may not jive well with that yeast combo
Anyways, I have personally stuck with using 1318 sans temp control (peak temps around 74-76) as I enjoy the final product immensely. I do plan to come back to testing these yeast (I like the idea of dry yeast v. dealing with starters and harvesting yeast).
Somewhat off topic...but what temp and pitch rate do you have success with s04 at your brewery? I've given it a couple shots lately and have not enjoyed the results. I can confirm getting bubblegum esters from it alone as well, i just find s04 to really dull down the hop flavors and aroma and enhance the breadiness compared to other strains...but I'd give it another shot.
Everyone's got different practices, but I have not found the keg conditioning to reduce hoppiness (haven't done a side-by-side though). This is anecdotal on my part, but I felt the hoppiness lasted longer, the beer was closer to yellow in color and the mouthfeel was slightly softer. These could all be confirmation bias, but I definitely didn't ruin my beers. Did save some CO2 though :rockin:
I am naturally carbing my attempt with gyle and CBC-1 right now as well. 4 days in the keg and it is sitting at just under 30 psi at room temp.
I will update you guys in a few days.
Just curious, did you cold crash your beer?
My best NEIPA that I've made to date was during my 3-way split batch experiment described ~10pgs back. It was the Citra-Mosaic done with 1318, fermented at ~75F and CBC-1 carbed. That thing was friggen' amazing. And I'm usually very over-humble and hyper-critical when it comes to assessing my homebrews.
I have 10 more gallons of it fermenting now.
Nice! My attempts so far have been with residual yeast after a "cool crash" (50F for 24 hr drops hop matter), and have taken between 5-7 days to hit final psi at RT.
See above. My goal is to drop enough debris to easily close transfer. You can monitor your blowoff tube to see if any suckback is occurring. I don't subscribe to the theory that you have to "shock" the liquid by crashing fast.
Awesome! Citra/Mosaic is def a fav, and pretty cost effective for hops these days. I haven't tried CBC-1 yet, how many g/gallon are you using? And rehydrated or sprinkled?
I think that carbing with CBC really helps the mouthfeel. My T-58 batch was force carbonated.I have a CBC-carbed Citra/Galaxy 6%ABV/70IBU NE Pale Ale now on tap that I made with 6g S-04 / 2g T-58 (75%/25% ratio) deliberately underpitched and fermented at ~75F. I used a simplified grainbill vs. my usual NEIPAs (85% Two-row, 10% Cara-Pils, 3% Honey malt, 2% Acid Malt), omitting Oats & White Wheat.
It has a phenomenal mouthfeel for a 6% ABV Pale Ale...better than TH Lights On, IMHO. It throws an amazing aroma, and taste is phenomenal...not belgiany at all.
FWIW...
I don't have my notes on me, but I think that I pitched at 75 and fermented uncontrolledGood to know, thanks. Out of curiosity, what temp did you pitch/ferment that attempt at? Not sure if you already mentioned this in an earlier post, but how many total grams did you pitch into how many gallons?
I pitched at 78F and didn't temp control this one which is a departure from other NEIPAs I've done (all with 1318). In the past I have pitched 1318 at 60F and raised the temp to 72F over the first 72 hours. This one just sat at a pretty steady 72F ambient. I pitched 13.4 g total into ~6 gal for 5 gal kegged.
You know, the one other thing I was thinking is that I doughed in at about 100F and decoction mashed this one (I know, I know, but I do it pretty often because I enjoy it). But then I remembered reading a BYO article that said that a mash rest just above 100F can make ferulic acid, which is a precursor to the clove phenol. I definitely got a perceptible amount of clove on this one. I mean, it doesn't scream hef, but there's more of that than I wanted, and certainly more than in any Treehouse beer I've had. Single infusion next time I guess.
My only issue with naturally carbonating is that I'm left with an over pressurized keg that I either need to off gas or pour some foamy pints from. I'm very adverse to off gassing because I don't want to lose that aroma. Has anyone thought of a solution to this?
My only issue with naturally carbonating is that I'm left with an over pressurized keg that I either need to off gas or pour some foamy pints from. I'm very adverse to off gassing because I don't want to lose that aroma. Has anyone thought of a solution to this?
***DNA fingerprinting update***
New strains analyzed in the right gel (old gel on the left for comparison purposes). Strain 1 (WY1056) was used as a control of sorts.
New strains (all are dry yeasts):
12: S-04
13: S-05
14: S-23
15: Danstar Munich
16: W-34/70
17: T-58
Nice to see S-05 and WY1056 have a very similar banding pattern, although this just further reinforces the previous commentary that similar strains at the genetic level can produce differences at the phenotypic level (e.g. S-05 krausen behavior v. WY1056).
S-23 and W-34/70 have very similar banding patterns as well. I haven't used either yeast, so can't say much there...
***REQUEST***
I am interested in testing more yeast strains, and would be willing to mail autoclaved blotting paper foil packets (see here: http://suigenerisbrewing.blogspot.com/2017/03/new-mailer-system.html) to those with yeast strains I have not tested yet. Shoot me a PM if interested.
I think that carbing with CBC really helps the mouthfeel. My T-58 batch was force carbonated.
Also, my Ariana single hop beer has taken a tropical spin since I carbed with a mix of yeasts. I think that I'll be doing this from now on. I haven't seen a reason not to
Yeah, I'm running into the same problem right now, my gauge is now pegged at just past 30 psi on my CBC-1 deal. This time I used the same amount of primer that I would have used to bottle condition. Next time I think I'll cut it down by a third or so. Seems like somewhere between almost flat beer out of primary and overcarbed there has to be a sweet spot. Just gotta find it!
Just kegged this last night after one week in the fermenter at 75. Do not have the exact % of yeast as my scale doesn't measure grams in decimals (just ordered one). The main work horse was s-04 which was just under 5g for a 2.5 gal batch. T-58 and wb-04 I literally had to eye ball in 1/4 of a tsp. I know this has huge variables but I had no choice. This beer came out a little more Belgian/hefe than I wanted and expected. Any ideas? Too much of one of the yeasts? Too high of a temp? I'll see how this develops and naturally carbs (1g CBC, 1oz sugar) in the keg and will report back.
Just kegged this last night after one week in the fermenter at 75....T-58 and wb-04 I literally had to eye ball in 1/4 of a tsp...This beer came out a little more Belgian/hefe than I wanted and expected.
Just kegged this last night after one week in the fermenter at 75. Do not have the exact % of yeast as my scale doesn't measure grams in decimals (just ordered one). The main work horse was s-04 which was just under 5g for a 2.5 gal batch. T-58 and wb-04 I literally had to eye ball in 1/4 of a tsp. I know this has huge variables but I had no choice. This beer came out a little more Belgian/hefe than I wanted and expected. Any ideas? Too much of one of the yeasts? Too high of a temp? I'll see how this develops and naturally carbs (1g CBC, 1oz sugar) in the keg and will report back.
If you are kegging at a week old, that's not flat beer. There is a lot of co2 in solution.
If you are cool/cold crashing, you are pulling more gas into solution.
Sooooo
You need less priming sugar or a better spunding rig.
With a spunding valve set correctly, your could use a half pound of priming sugar and be okay.
If you are just transferring the beer and sealing the keg, yeah, gonna be over carbed
The difference in bottling and this is:
A)when we bottled, we left our beers in primary a bit longer. It off gassed some.
B)when we bottled, we transferred into a bottling bucket, etc, and it off gassed.
Transferring under pressure doesn't allow gas (much) to escape.
In short, if u are sealing the keg, try 1/3 less priming sugar as stated.
Good luck and cheers!
I don't know if this was mentioned but, is there any chance that TH is blending two fermentations in the bright tank?
I could see the benefit of being able to produce a broader ester profile with different temps and pitch rates.
Half S04 underpitched and fermented warm
Half of the blend, regular pitch rate, fermented cool to keep the pepper and banana in check.
Just a thought.
Is the belgian/hefe character strong? Is it like a Duvel? Or like an Andechs/Schneider hefe? Or are those flavours more subtle?
How heavy did you dry hopped it? Maybe dry hop a bit more?
If you were to taste the beer for the first time or give it to some friends, that drink craft beer, what would you/they say?
But I am looking forward for your feedback once the beer is fully carbonated.
I'm not surprised after a week at 75F - pitch at that kind of temperature but let it fall to 66F or so and you should be OK, perhaps even drop it to 60F after high krausen.
The CAMRA membership forms are here
Like a blended wine, I don't see why not unless Nate denied it on twitter.
Which 'Danstar Munich' did you test as seen in #15 above? 'Classic' or 'Wheat'?
It has the slightest hint of it and it's hard to pin point right now. Definitely not strong. It also had that tang acid taste. Don't have a bench mark, but it definitely has that character of a Belgian/hefe beer. Have to let it carbonate and see. Also one thing to note is the hops were a bit muted. I used 8oz total for a 2.5 gal batch. Half of that was for dry hops. Hard to say without it being carbonated, but if I were to try it for the fist time I would think it was a slight Belgian IPA. Dang it! Lol
Like a blended wine, I don't see why not unless Nate denied it on twitter.
Enter your email address to join: