This is me as well. I haven't changed anything in my process because of his experiments. I find them interesting for sure, but as he says, it's 1 data point, and I'm not as confident in the consistency of his process to say he's isolating variables enough to make a difference, nor do I necessarily trust his method of evaluation.
Point his, here experiments certainly warrant discussion, but until they can be replicated on large scale by everyone, I will typically continue to side with established brewing science (where the methods are much more rigorous and the testing much more exhaustive) until I'm sufficiently convinced otherwise.
Of course, I'm also never satisfied with "hey, I made beer", so perhaps I hold my brewing to a more anal retentive standard than most.