I agree that it would be nice to see the mash pH reported to the hundreths. But, there is an issue with significant digits that we learn in chemistry. If any input in an equation has low precision, then the reported result can't have any higher precision than that low-lier. The other problem is that there is no way a program like this could predict pH to that precision. Predicting to a tenth of a unit is about as good as we could expect.
I agree that being able to see the variation in the hundreths would be helpful in assessing your treatment adjustments, its just that too many brewers would think that they could expect that level of accuracy in practice. I suppose I could put a disclaimer in there to help the brewer understand this limitation. But you know that some will miss that!