IndyBlueprints
Well-Known Member
Very interesting article/interview from HBT this morning, with Neva Parker from White Labs.
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/science-suds-interview-neva-parker-white-labs.html
The most shocking comments she made was the answer to the last question. This directly contradicts what I have read almost everywhere about yeast starters:
If the yeast starter is not greatly increasing the cell count to 200 Billion or more, then aren't we going to under pitch a batch if we take some of the starter to make a new starter, and/or "wash" some of the starter batch?
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/science-suds-interview-neva-parker-white-labs.html
The most shocking comments she made was the answer to the last question. This directly contradicts what I have read almost everywhere about yeast starters:
what I always try to guide people towards is the right way to make a starter, or at least understanding that a starter in and of itself is not growing a whole bunch of new yeast. I think thats just a misconception that people have about starters in general. You know, Im just going to take a package of yeast that I buy, throw it into a one- or two-liter starter, and Im just going to double or triple or quadruple the amount of yeast that I have, but thats just not true. Theres not enough food and nutrients there to have that happen.
If the yeast starter is not greatly increasing the cell count to 200 Billion or more, then aren't we going to under pitch a batch if we take some of the starter to make a new starter, and/or "wash" some of the starter batch?