Colbizle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 47
I'm brewing a cali common later this week for an NHC entry. BJCP guidelines states: "Water should have relatively low sulfate and low to moderate carbonate levels."
So targeting the amber balanced profile with mineral adjustments and lowering the bicarbonate I can hit a target mash PH of 5.4.
Does this look ok? I guess my question is, is the amber balanced profile a good target for California common? Or would the amber bitter be a better profile? What is considered low sulfate? 80s or low 100s?
Starting water profile:
Calcium 25
Magnesium 3.8
Sodium 14
Sulfate 26
Chloride 30
Avg. Alk (CaCO3) 45
Bicarb (HCO3) 51
Avg. pH 9
Finished water profile:
Calcium 56
Magnesium 10
Sodium 14
Sulfate 81
Chloride 63
Alk (CaCO3) 39
Bicarb (HCO3) 47.5
Mash PH 5.4
SO4/CL: 1.3
So targeting the amber balanced profile with mineral adjustments and lowering the bicarbonate I can hit a target mash PH of 5.4.
Does this look ok? I guess my question is, is the amber balanced profile a good target for California common? Or would the amber bitter be a better profile? What is considered low sulfate? 80s or low 100s?
Starting water profile:
Calcium 25
Magnesium 3.8
Sodium 14
Sulfate 26
Chloride 30
Avg. Alk (CaCO3) 45
Bicarb (HCO3) 51
Avg. pH 9
Finished water profile:
Calcium 56
Magnesium 10
Sodium 14
Sulfate 81
Chloride 63
Alk (CaCO3) 39
Bicarb (HCO3) 47.5
Mash PH 5.4
SO4/CL: 1.3