Nubiwan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2018
- Messages
- 584
- Reaction score
- 364
Good, now we're getting somewhere. Do you think it's possible that by not making sure that readers know how to correctly interpret the P-values (which most do not), the result is that many of those readers take the words "... indicating participants in this xBmt were unable to reliably distinguish..." as an indication that there's likely no difference? If not, why not?
They often validate tests themselves and, in general, agree with the panels findings. Id trust those perceptions, knowing there should be a difference, more than someone on a forum suggesting you'll make "paint thinner" if you dont ferment lager at 35 degrees. Its happened. .
Each experiment is different, so you have to weigh them independently. How the results are used is up to the individual. I can only go back to my own brewing results, and weigh it with other peoples comments. And personal results.
At the very least, they do the experiments and publish results in an open manner. Nobody else does it.