yeastforbrains
Well-Known Member
The question about whether rehydrating dry yeast in water versus sprinkle directly on wort has already been discussed so many times and in so many ways that it is difficult to justify a new post on the subject. Yet, there's no way back now, if you read this, it is posted, justified or not.
The reason I post is I am not satisfied with the existing explanations. I never come across any real easy and yet plausible explanation to why wort can damage the dry yeast, or why one can seemingly still get away with sprinkling directly. Voila, this is my self-granted entrance ticket to the subject, this is where I will try to tackle the justification point.
It has been scientifically proven that sprinkling directly in wort instantly kills off 50% of the cells you are pitching.
So, why does rehydrating in water result in so much healthier yeast count?
This leads to another question -> what was removed from the yeast when it went through the dehydration process? The answer is of course, water.
So to bring this dormant, dried, but still living organism, back to its original state, the natural instinct should be to put back what was removed in the first place; not milk, not mustard, not lemon juice, not wort, but pure water. Rehydrating it in any other "unpure" liquid, you will naturally risk poisoning or mutate the cell. At the moment of rehydration, the dried cell is a non-selective sponge, sucking in whatever liquid it has contact with, not caring if it is water or poison.
Ok then, so why on earth sprinkle directly on top?
Obviously, this method removes some time and infection risks from the process. To rehydrate in an adequately sanitized or sterile manner, you will have to boil water and cool it down in a sterilized/sanitized vessel. Then add the yeast, then wait 30 minutes, then gradually introduce wort to dilute the temperature difference etc. It's not a simple question of taking a dishwasher clean cup from your cabinet, adding lukewarm tap water, swirl and pitch. If you do it properly, it takes time and is quite a bit of a pain.
Also, what do you gain in terms of end results? Here there's no decisive conclusions to pull from any objective sources. People who tried both claim they get good results with both methods. Hard to tell any difference, even when pitching the same amount of yeast in both cases. People who tried both, seems to prefer sprinkling directly on wort.
I haven't seen any good explanations to why this is. I have however read that dead yeast makes an excellent nutrition for living cells, but is it so excellent that it could void the difference in (healthy cells) pitch rate, and justify the mass-murdering act of sprinkling directly to wort?
The reason I post is I am not satisfied with the existing explanations. I never come across any real easy and yet plausible explanation to why wort can damage the dry yeast, or why one can seemingly still get away with sprinkling directly. Voila, this is my self-granted entrance ticket to the subject, this is where I will try to tackle the justification point.
It has been scientifically proven that sprinkling directly in wort instantly kills off 50% of the cells you are pitching.
So, why does rehydrating in water result in so much healthier yeast count?
This leads to another question -> what was removed from the yeast when it went through the dehydration process? The answer is of course, water.
So to bring this dormant, dried, but still living organism, back to its original state, the natural instinct should be to put back what was removed in the first place; not milk, not mustard, not lemon juice, not wort, but pure water. Rehydrating it in any other "unpure" liquid, you will naturally risk poisoning or mutate the cell. At the moment of rehydration, the dried cell is a non-selective sponge, sucking in whatever liquid it has contact with, not caring if it is water or poison.
Ok then, so why on earth sprinkle directly on top?
Obviously, this method removes some time and infection risks from the process. To rehydrate in an adequately sanitized or sterile manner, you will have to boil water and cool it down in a sterilized/sanitized vessel. Then add the yeast, then wait 30 minutes, then gradually introduce wort to dilute the temperature difference etc. It's not a simple question of taking a dishwasher clean cup from your cabinet, adding lukewarm tap water, swirl and pitch. If you do it properly, it takes time and is quite a bit of a pain.
Also, what do you gain in terms of end results? Here there's no decisive conclusions to pull from any objective sources. People who tried both claim they get good results with both methods. Hard to tell any difference, even when pitching the same amount of yeast in both cases. People who tried both, seems to prefer sprinkling directly on wort.
I haven't seen any good explanations to why this is. I have however read that dead yeast makes an excellent nutrition for living cells, but is it so excellent that it could void the difference in (healthy cells) pitch rate, and justify the mass-murdering act of sprinkling directly to wort?