@ccous
Please help me understand...
How do you know yeast are more prevalent than bacteria either airborne or on particular surfaces? Source please?
Not all bacteria are sensitive to hops. How can you make a determination that a pellicle is more likely formed by yeast than bacteria in this situation?
There are many genera of wild yeast, some of whom can form a pellicle. How are you determining that Brett is the most likely?
In your experience with wild fermentation, do you isolate and identify single strains?If not, how can you make a conclusion as to which organism(s) are involved in pellicle formation? Wouldn't you need to study them individually? Even if you did, how could you exclude the possibility that other organisms present could also form a pellicle, without definitively isolating and studying
all of them? I'm just not sure how wild fermentation experience provides any additional information on identifying an organism, since pellicles don't really seem to broadcast the identity of the microbe(s) that formed it.
For now I'd have to say, "pellicle with
hops therefore
yeast therefore
Brett" is a non sequitur conclusion. I'm definitely open to learning more about this
[/QUOTE]
Obviously just made a quick assumption, which is why I said he 'could' have inadvertently made a brett beer. It is hard to know what will land and take hold in an already fermented out beer. In no way am I confident in what took hold in this beer. I do not isolate and identify single strains because I don't have the time or resources. I'm sure you're familiar with more literature than I am, and you've probably read this:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3991685/. It gives a good idea of the sequence of what organisms take hold and ferment out lambics. As far as I know nothing similar has been done to see and what takes hold in fermented/finished beer. I'm also pretty sure it's pretty hard to infect beer by dry hopping it; I've never had it happen in the dozens of times I've dry hopped a beer, so something must have touched this beer (and had a hefty load of organisms) or it was exposed to the environment for an extended time. So just based off the order of what takes hold in lambics and when, I just made the following assumptions:
1) Enterobacteriaceae - very ubiquitous in environment - but probably not, as they are sensitive to anything over 2% alcohol (hop sensitive as well?). Many other bacterial organisms (most I believe) are ethanol sensitive. Not sure a few organisms of any bacteria (Enterobacter, Klebsiella, E. coli) would be able to take hold strongly and quickly in finished beer.
2) Sacch cerevisiae and pastorianus - well, the beer is already done and these don't form pellicles
3) Pedio damnosus -
could be, but I'm not sure how quickly pedio forms a pellicle as described, or whether it would take hold that quickly in fermented out beer. I think they would need at minimum a few weeks/likely months to show any evidence they are there. Acetobacter could also be there but they really like oxygen and are more of a contaminant during longer aging.
4) LAB - most are hop sensitive, I know some are not. I have strains that are not. Again, wouldn't LAB take hold much more slowly in finished beer? I don't know for sure, but like Pedio I assumed so
5)
D. brux/other spp - ethanol-resistant, acid-resistant, not hop sensitive. Therefore can easily take hold in a finished beer. And will form a pellicle pretty darn quickly, given what I've seen when purposely pitching small amounts of brux or lambicus into fermented beers to age.
6) Any other of a number organisms present in the environment, but I know nothing about how easily they will take hold in an acidic (finished ale is generally in the low to mid 4% range), alcoholic (likely over5-6% in this case), and highly hopped environment. So it was just a quick guess based off my limited background. Could for sure be plenty of other wild yeasts (Candida, Hanseniaspora, etc.), which I favor over bacteria. I do not know how these behave/what to expect from them or how they look. But I will redact my original comment and simply say: "My guess is you may have inadvertently made a nice wild IPA/hoppy farmhouse ale." Who knows. I would taste it after a month and see if its heading in a positive direction.