allanmorgan
Well-Known Member
Everyone should read this
Great insight and a great article. Woke me up to what I wasn't paying attention to.
Now I am. BMC's motives are darker than they appear.
Everyone should read this
.So... they had PBR on tap and just for the hell of it I tried one. To my surprise it was quite good!
So what. Nothing changed at NB. My grains still come from Wyermann my yeast from Wyeast.InBev already bought the biggest home brew supplier in USA! They know what they are doing.
So what. Nothing changed at NB. My grains still come from Wyermann my yeast from Wyeast.
I've started buying from NB since Rebel Brewer shut down. I'm pretty happy with the service.
Wait a minute...
I've been assimilated!!!
InBev has even got their filthy mitts into my homebrew.
BASTARDS!!!!!!!
I live down the street and know the brewery very well. Tony McGee will still operate Lagunitas and still design future beers but now under Heineken. Their goal is to create a "craft beer" division, which will be under Lagunitas for worldwide distribution. They mainly just operate out of Petaluma, CA and Boston right now with more in he works in Europe, potentially Amsterdam.
But it is sad to see a small local brewery grow so large and be bought out by a corporation as large as Heineken. C'est la vie!
At least we still have Russian River Brewing Company
Damn. I drink Lagunitas every summer when I'm back in the States. I guess no more Aunt Sally and SUCKS for me...
Well they didn't come out with Aunt Sally until after they sold the first 50% in 2015 so...maybe this means you wont have to wait til your back in the states...
Don't fool yourselves. There is not a single person on this forum that if they started a brewery business and grew it so it could be sold for millions and millions of dollars wouldn't sell. Most of these breweries are started from the beginning with that intent. No one starts a business to lose money.
I know many brewers who would not sell to InBev for any amount of money, because doing so hurts their friends and the entire craft beer market.
The corporate paranoia on this site is so over the top it is borderline ridiculous.
The reason that these giants buy 'smaller' breweries is not with hostile intent towards the brewery or its customers.
The purchaser is interested in buying only for the additional revenue, margin, and diversification.
The seller is looking for stability, growth, and a nice paycheck for the owners.
Why would a mega-brewer spend a ton of money to buy a successful craft brewer and then tear it apart? Do you really think that whether or not Lagunitas exists is going to impact Heineken sales in any way shape or form? They don't compete in the same market segment. If Lagunitas were to disappear forever, the impact on the existing line of Heineken products would be so minimal as to be negligible.
Heineken won't replace the brewery staff or change the fundamental production aspect of the brewery; they might absorb human resources, accounting, and marketing into their existing framework and use their management experience to help existing managers perform better, but that is all.
Craft beer snobs and the fringe homebrewers want it both ways; to see their passion as being legitimate without being accepted by the main stream.
I disagree. Heineken ruined Bohemia, which was one of the few great production brews until Heiny bought them and cheapened down the recipe with adjuncts and less hops. Bud has done the same thing to a few of the formerly revered craft brands they bought, turning them into watered-down versions of their previous selves. I don't begrudge the owners for getting paid, but I also don't begrudge the fans when they see the imminent end of an era of a great pioneer brand. I have been a big fan of Lagunitas for producing great beers and keeping prices fair for years, and am sad to see them go.
I disagree. Heineken ruined Bohemia, which was one of the few great production brews until Heiny bought them and cheapened down the recipe with adjuncts and less hops. Bud has done the same thing to a few of the formerly revered craft brands they bought, turning them into watered-down versions of their previous selves. I don't begrudge the owners for getting paid, but I also don't begrudge the fans when they see the imminent end of an era of a great pioneer brand. I have been a big fan of Lagunitas for producing great beers and keeping prices fair for years, and am sad to see them go.
I think it would be interesting to see actual proof of claims like these.
When a macro bought beer "changes" it is deemed to because they bean counted ingredients for maximum profitability.
But when craft beer changes, from year to year, it's accepted as being a natural product bound to the will of seasonal changes in ingredients, blah, blah.
Can anyone actually prove that the X beer (Bohemia) recipe changed after acquisition? I suspect it does happen, but not near as drastically, or as often as most claim.
Enter your email address to join: