Darwin18
Well-Known Member
I'll usually check out CNN.com for news while online and then check out their sports section of their website. Up until last month, it took you to sports illustrated. It's not ESPN, but it was comparable and many of the contributors such as Peter King, Dr. Z (pre-stroke), Tim Heyman, etc are solid, and hey at least there is always the swim suit calendar. What I liked most about SI was that there wasn't any of that Insider subscription that ESPN slaps on at least 60% of their content.
So when the CNN website started saying they were replacing SI with Bleacher Report last month, my first thought was "Great, another sports site to check out".
It's absolute garbage. It looks just like the celebrity gossip websites that my wife looks through. There is no articles, no analysis, nothing original - just photographs and twitter things that I don't understand. As far as I can tell it is just lists of photographs with the occasional two or three sentences of text. Is this seriously reporting?
So when the CNN website started saying they were replacing SI with Bleacher Report last month, my first thought was "Great, another sports site to check out".
It's absolute garbage. It looks just like the celebrity gossip websites that my wife looks through. There is no articles, no analysis, nothing original - just photographs and twitter things that I don't understand. As far as I can tell it is just lists of photographs with the occasional two or three sentences of text. Is this seriously reporting?