bassmosphere
Active Member
I was curious what you guys thing about the balance between aging a beer and the actual design of a recipe. I brewed a beer out of Charlie Papazian's book called called Deep Sleep Stout, or something similar. I had it in the carboy for roughly 4-5 weeks, and I've had it in the keg another 4 weeks since that.
When I first had the beer it was OK, if I had bought it at the store I probably would have finished it...eventually. As I've been drinking it, the flavor has definitely evolved. More coffee and chocolaty, its a better beer for sure. I've read the "age it" mantra here time and time again, but I've heard folks on the brewing network mention that if you rely on aging to correct flavor issues, t hen you've probably got a recipe problem.
It's probably not that simple, but what are the indicators of what steps you should take? For instance, I felt like my beer was too hoppy initially. Does that mean I should add less hops next time, or try a different strain? Anyway, curious to hear more on this topic.
When I first had the beer it was OK, if I had bought it at the store I probably would have finished it...eventually. As I've been drinking it, the flavor has definitely evolved. More coffee and chocolaty, its a better beer for sure. I've read the "age it" mantra here time and time again, but I've heard folks on the brewing network mention that if you rely on aging to correct flavor issues, t hen you've probably got a recipe problem.
It's probably not that simple, but what are the indicators of what steps you should take? For instance, I felt like my beer was too hoppy initially. Does that mean I should add less hops next time, or try a different strain? Anyway, curious to hear more on this topic.