Anyone with experience with WLP029?

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jordan Logo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
190
Reaction score
93
Location
San Francisco, CA
Anyone ever use this yeast?

I decided to try out Brulosopher's Best Blonde Ale this past weekend and pitched my yeast at 56 degrees and have been fermenting at 58 degrees for the past 2-3 days now and haven't really seen any airlock activity like I normally see. I do see a small krausen forming which is giving me some hope. I just switched to MoreBeer's buckets which maybe might be the issue?

Any help would be awesome!
 
I have used WL029 several times in the past for a Kolsch recipe. Based on what you've said, you're fermenting a bit lower than the optimal temperature range for the yeast strain. According to White Lab's information, WL029 ferments best at between 65-69 Fahrenheit. The yeast may be still be OK, just fermenting your wort a lot slower than expected. What I would do is place the fermenter someplace where you can bring the fermentation temperature up between 65-69 and see what happens.
 
Looking at Brulosopher's recipe, I see where it does say to ferment at 58°F for 4-5 days then ramp up to 65° over the next few days, then cold crash for 48+ hours after FG is stable (10-14 days). So, I would slowly ramp the temperature up to 65 in another day or two and see what happens.
 
Looking at Brulosopher's recipe, I see where it does say to ferment at 58°F for 4-5 days then ramp up to 65° over the next few days, then cold crash for 48+ hours after FG is stable (10-14 days). So, I would slowly ramp the temperature up to 65 in another day or two and see what happens.

makes sense... do you have any experience on why someone would ferment so far below a recommended fermentation temp THEN ramp up?
 
pitched my yeast at 56 degrees and have been fermenting at 58 degrees for the past 2-3 days now and haven't really seen any airlock activity like I normally see. I do see a small krausen forming which is giving me some hope. I just switched to MoreBeer's buckets which maybe might be the issue?

If fermentation seems sluggish, then it's usually lacking either quantity or quality of yeast. What sort of starter did you make?

As an aside, the latest sequencing data suggests WLP029 is probably a lager yeast so probably best treated as such.
 
If fermentation seems sluggish, then it's usually lacking either quantity or quality of yeast. What sort of starter did you make?

As an aside, the latest sequencing data suggests WLP029 is probably a lager yeast so probably best treated as such.

I went ahead and just pitched 2 packets due to lack of time for a starter. I mean it looks fine... I see a Krausen formed, maybe there's not a good seal on the bucket lid? Would that really affect any flavor since the co2 is still creating a "layer" between the outside air and the wort?
 
I went ahead and just pitched 2 packets due to lack of time for a starter. I mean it looks fine... I see a Krausen formed, maybe there's not a good seal on the bucket lid? Would that really affect any flavor since the co2 is still creating a "layer" between the outside air and the wort?
How did it turn out?
 
I've used WLP029 at ambient temps near 59-60F with no real trouble. My method is to use a pitch a nice 500ml starter using liquid yeast, and a weak solution of wort left to sit for about two hours before pitching. Starting gravity of my beer wort is 1.050 or less and it finishes off nice and clear in about two to three weeks in primary.
Yeast has very low ester/phenol production and drops nicely. I don't bother with raising the temperature at all because a nice, long slow fermentation with a healthy pitch of this yeast strain doesn't tend to produce significant diacetyl or sulfide.
 
Back
Top