rlodermeier
Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
Can this be real? I did 2 IPA's with majority 2-Row but completely different hop profiles. All additions grains were completely different. The third was a Scotch boiled for 90 and obviously completely different everything than the 2 IPA's. each OG I got was 1.070 just about on the nose. I use Beer Smith and at at 70% efficiency I should have been around 1.085-1.090. I obviously did not get close
My question is I am starting to think my hydrometer is playing tricks on me or I am taking the sample wrong. I means, I guess I could be so consistently non-efficient; but, even my mash in and sparging processes I altered each time. Below are my 3 different processes:
IPA 1: 75 min mash in, started with 6.2 gallons water, cold sparked with hose. I know, stupid. Then just grained it all out
IPA 2: 75 min mash in, 3x 1 gallon recirculation, gentle drain and spared with 170F water all at once.
Scotch: 75 min mash in, 3x 1/2 gallon recirculation, gentle drain and sparged 5x with .8 gallons water while draining
I just seems hard to believe each beer with the alterations of methods would yield the exact same result. Any thoughts folks?
My question is I am starting to think my hydrometer is playing tricks on me or I am taking the sample wrong. I means, I guess I could be so consistently non-efficient; but, even my mash in and sparging processes I altered each time. Below are my 3 different processes:
IPA 1: 75 min mash in, started with 6.2 gallons water, cold sparked with hose. I know, stupid. Then just grained it all out
IPA 2: 75 min mash in, 3x 1 gallon recirculation, gentle drain and spared with 170F water all at once.
Scotch: 75 min mash in, 3x 1/2 gallon recirculation, gentle drain and sparged 5x with .8 gallons water while draining
I just seems hard to believe each beer with the alterations of methods would yield the exact same result. Any thoughts folks?